[What’s new in F# 6](https://devblogs.microsoft.com/dotnet/whats-new-in-fsharp-6/)
[Life, F# and NativeAOT](https://codevision.medium.com/life-f-and-nativeaot-b65fee97deb2)
[F# Ukraine 2020](https://youtu.be/HP4MI2gGIg0)
good idea, agreed
I mean I guess there isn't any other meaning for a c# tag here except 'how to do this c# in f#, am I right?
would `csharp` (or just `c#`) be enough to imply `csharp-to-fsharp` here?
request for `mvvm` and, probably, `csharp-to-fsharp` tags
If they confirm it isn't ok, I guess we can do something like that — putting a "TA" in the middle or something!
I don't think so - I vaguely remember discussion about using the logo for F# sub-reddit.
Previously it looked like:
My gut feeling is that they will be fine with it in this context.
Thanks, I have now contacted The F# Software Foundation to ask if it is OK
> Do not use the logo in a context which could imply representation of the F# Software Foundation directly
I think logo has to be different: [The F# Software Foundation Logo for F#](http://foundation.fsharp.org/logo)
Enter question or answer id or url (and optionally further answer ids/urls from the same question) from
Separate each id/url with a space. No need to list your own answers; they will be imported automatically.