@Skillmon I just saw your mail on the dante list. Would you maybe like to translate it and post as answer to https://topanswers.xyz/tex?q=2144 ?
How did you like the ducks with the Indian flags, which Ulrike created?
Also if anybody is interested in how a particular scene was created, all of your code is available in this repository: https://github.com/TikZlings/Extravaganza2024
[![icon_medium.png](/image?hash=3e7361460ae21212ff27d1dadd76734b4fd8ffebd8f1a50152a98b151035975b)](https://vimeo.com/1038963018)
The 2024 version of the Great Tikzlings Christmas Extravaganza has just been released. It presents mariachi marmots and flower power in San Francisco, has a look at the TUG Annual Conferences 2025, reports on the LaTeX tagging project, takes a foto at a well known location, discovers the hitherto unknown Batbär, and contains many other Christmas surprises. Watch it now on Vimeo
![Screenshot 2024-12-13 092116.png](/image?hash=ef1511dc62f11573e4f63628a0782d2becc65aa76c64a2646db2237a21b2e3ec)
They do! And they look very good: ![document-1.png](/image?hash=cfff8ca83314a81b78b59c41c67344ae32d7b667ca154ac6eef559d9707df4c4)
TeX Live update is mandatory. Only TikZducks by now, I think I should wait till tomorrow for TikZlings :D
The update of the TikZlings package to version 2.0 is also the conclusion of another project: to use a consistent design for all my package documentations: ![Screenshot 2024-12-11 at 10.25.28.png](/image?hash=34cfe07265f83af400fe555bcf787177a7e604bbfed63297a40773a6d128c9bf)
The new version 2.0 of the TikZlings package makes its way around the [ctan mirrors](https://ctan.org/pkg/tikzlings). It brings two new TikZlings, Sandra the ape and Ambrogio the meerkat. Many thanks to @NuzzleTOO and @CarLaTeX for contributing them! ![ICON.png](/image?hash=1f16227706635e625d80a2a78818ec74b3571bd3004c2d2063b14aa05917ef40) Note: v2.0 contains a none backward compatible change regarding the reference point of the body colour. If you've used the `body=...` option in the past, the resulting TikZlings might now have a slightly different colour.
Thanks. I agree. The `@` syntax indeed seems to be a little confusing. I still have some questions regarding this, but I will post a question itself. It better stays as a resource for everyone.
So yes, it's the name for internal functions, similar to how `@`-containing macros signalled that in 2e (though often not, the borders in 2e were a lot more blurry, imo)
sorry for the late reply: Yes, sort of. Basically `__module` means some function I need internally but is not guaranteed to stay the same (or even defined at all) between versions.
In LaTeX3, what do we exactly mean by "private use"? Is `\module@cmd` the exact 2e equivalent of, say, `\__module_cmd:n`?
Well German has a few weirdnesses which make it absolutely not phonetic. For instance for adjectives the ending "-ig" is pronounced like "-ich" (in standard German and northern dialects, southern dialects pronounce it `-ig`), but for (every?) other words an ending in some soft consonants is pronounced with their hard alternatives. For instance a word ending in "-d" is pronounced as if it's ending in "-t". Also Germans put breaks between each words and between two consecutive vowels.
Interesting! I had heard that the Germanic group of languages has complex sound systems than the Romance group. I can kind of see that by looking at German and Italian, at least. (Oh and of course, English too!)
Big names of the Nazi regime were quite known for their pronunciation of R (to the point that if someone you know rolls the R you usually know instantaneous that they're parodying Hitler). We actually have regionally different ways to pronounce the r even. From the top of my head I can think of 3 distinct ways to form an R (and then you got people who roll it longer than others), one of which is really at the same spot like the X in TeX, though with a slight roll to it, so it sounds different.
So "wichtig" is [[ˈvɪçtɪç]](https://de.wiktionary.org/wiki/wichtig), "Loch" is [[lɔx]](https://de.wiktionary.org/wiki/Loch), and "Chamäleon" is [[kaˈmɛːleˌɔn]](https://de.wiktionary.org/wiki/Cham%C3%A4leon).
No, German has an R, just not an Indian sounding one. We actually have different `r` sounds. The "X" from TeX is spelled "ch" (though that letter combination has three ways to pronounce it, "Loch" and "ach" for instance sound like TeX, if a word starts with "ch" it's usually pronounced like "k" (and only written with "ch" for ethymologic reasons), and then we have words like "wichtig" in which it's pronounced differently from TeX -- TeX has the sound near your throat, "wichtig" has it in the front of your mouth. I'll see whether I can find some IPA transliterations.
Ahh, great! I think you have the sound of "X" from "TeX" in place of R, right?
I think except for the "R" that's just the German pronunciation of your transliteration.
Niranjan; NI - RAN (as in _/run/_) - JAN (the same vowel as in _/run/_, but with a _/j/_).