I'm not the first to suggest this. There was an earlier Indian user group, and a lot of TeX activity there for a long time. Two TUG annual meetings were held in Trivandrum, in 2002 and 2011; I attended the 2011 edition and had an excellent experience. I will try to attend in 2025 (Trivandrum again), but that's still too far off to be sure.
Geeky stunt of the year (a GitHub contributor timeline, in 2012): ![cf109e81093887f5.png](/image?hash=cd4b77c0c842f8b5e0b5f6534f6d3fad62b3a1fe1aabafa9e7e8a19582555edd) This is real: https://github.com/tomhazledine?tab=overview&from=2012-12-01&to=2012-12-31 Source [here](https://mastodon.social/@tomhazledine/112557623035267824).
The minted maintainer wasn't kidding when he said that with minted3, the first run might take longer :) ``` Latexmk: All targets (tikzlings-doc.pdf) are up-to-date 'pdflatex': time = 282.51 'pdflatex': time = 21.54 Processing time = 304.59, of which invoked processes = 304.05, other = 0.54. Elapsed clock time = 310.61. Number of rules run = 2 ```
If you cross-post the same question on multiple sites, it would be nice if you would mention the other versions so people won't give you the same resources a second time.
TikZ has a library called "perspective" that renders 3D scenes to the 2d canvas in perspective (so that objects far away from the viewer appear smaller). I am interested in understanding the geometrical calculations behind perspective drawings, and I want to implement this projection in another programming language. So I looked at the library's code, which is not long, but because I don't have any knowledge in core-pgf macros, I have a few missing links. I am not sure what the library does to the x, y and z coordinates of the point I am plotting in it. Can any one here help me out with understanding the math of this library? Perhaps in a chat room here?
Dear marketing-genius who put ducks on a tube of hand cream: you successfully sold a tube to me :) ![duck.jpg](/image?hash=12a2cb700644197891c50d79e9ecad935eb7c8a474acd4978cf6b09fb8e3ceea)
It is tempting to create a Bayeux tapestry package https://fosstodon.org/@volcan01010/113187543644578349
Package in the spotlight: [fgruler](https://www.ctan.org/pkg/fgruler) - one package to rule them all :P
Big minted changes on the horizon: https://github.com/gpoore/minted/releases/tag/latex%2Fv3.0.0
Also worth watching: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Te_WHneeD3s
Thanks for the article! Very interesting! If you are looking for more dodo content: search for "Adam Savage Dodo". There are several videos in which he assembles a 3d printed replica of a dodo skeleton and other cool projects.
> It has no relation to TeX Don't let the context people hear this :)
A nice souvenir indeed. While thinking about birds, I read this article today. It has no relation to (La)TeX, but reminded me that, at the TUG meeting at Oxford, we saw the exhibit of the bird that's the subject of this article: https://www.nytimes.com/2024/09/20/science/archaeology-dodo-extinction.html?unlocked_article_code=1.ME4.sh1V.7F8rMBej6m56&smid=url-share
I had another good find in Darmstadt. When we were walking in the park, I spotted a pretty blue feather, discarded by a bird that I couldn't identify. It made a really nice addition to my hat, and I'm still enjoying it.
Oh, I remember the mastodon in Darmstadt! It was very impressive. It was also nice that the museum was only a stone throw away from the conference hotel. The organisers choose the location very well :) Next year's Dante meeting is going to be in Darmstadt. Maybe I can visit it again.
Oh, and it's related to printing too. How nice! My favorite fossil is Peale's Mastodon. See https://americanart.si.edu/exhibitions/humboldt/online/charles-willson-peale-exhumation and the places it links to. My mother took me to that museum quite often when I was growing up; I suspect that's one reason I like to find out how things work. Anyhow, while in Darmstadt for the TUG meeting. Gordon and I visited the natural history museum, and there it was -- Peale's Mastodon! A wonderful coincidence!
Oh, I like the description "uralt". It supports my practice of referring to myself as a "fossil". (I like fossils, and have a nice little collection of shark's teeth that I found myself. Bigger bones I enjoy in museums.)
Wow, even in my corrective message I got a typo. My orthographic ability seems quite hindered this evening, maybe I should head for my bed.
Whoopsie, obviously it's saying "Pairing" don't ask me where/how that "y" came out of my fingers... :)
Now I feel uncreative (is that a word in English?), my commuter is called Cherry, because it's small, red, and has as little power as Perry got (which is the car of my younger brother, which I named Perry because of his radio which is always saying "Waiting for Parrying" on Bluetooth mode when you start the car, but the Parrying is so mispronounced that one might understand "Waiting for Perry").
The names of the current two cars are from Ann McCaffrey's Dragonrider series. Gordon's is Mnementh (shortened to NEMNTH to fit the plate requirements) and mine is CANTH. My previous car was named FAFNIR. I once considered a Mini, and that would have been named SMAUG, but when I "tried it on" (the Mini), it didn't fit.
Hamlet seems to be the trend of the year. The open air Shakespeare festival at Prague Castle also gave Hamlet this year (unfortunately the English language performances took place only after TUG'24)
Gordon and I never did bumper stickers, but our license plates show the car's given name, and we've always named our cars after dragons. Re the dashes, TUGboat defines `\Dash` as an em-dash with a thin space on either side. I really dislike seeing dashes bash into what's on either side of them. And re the quote, just last week I attended a "kickoff party" for one of the local theater companies, and there was a delightful riff on that quote, demonstrating many different ways it could be mishandled by an inept actor. Hamlet is on the schedule for the season, and I'll be watching for how the designated actor handles it. I suspect it will be an interpretation that didn't show up in the parody.
"The world is flat"? Just checking if I Google translated the right slide.
I came across this tool on mastodon. Might be useful. https://text.makeup/#To%20be%E2%80%89%E2%80%94%E2%80%89or%20not%20to%20be%3F%E2%80%89%E2%80%94%E2%80%89that%20is%20the%20question. (I think it is from the same author as Shift Happens)
True indeed, although from at least the Saab model that I first drove, they were designed to protect the occupants and sacrifice the vehicle. That's why I still drive a Saab, and hope it lasts as long as I do since they are now effectively extinct.
Quite unexpectedly, the color applied to comments here that are associated with one another, triggered by mouseover, is very similar to the mentioned car color. Hmmm.
Indeed! What made it even more funny: something similar actually happened in the slides to one of the earlier talks that day :)
I usually choose the theme colour to match the title graphic of the slides - maybe I should give a talk about mustard yellow cars and this colour would match perfectly :) (it would be a short talk: "Welcome to this talk about mustard yellow cars. As you can all see, their colour match perfectly the theme colour of these slides. Thanks for your attention!")