Yeah to rabbits! Now we'll just have to figure out how to bring Barbara back: https://topanswers.xyz/meta?q=8154
... but what if you meet the author of the licence, distract them and they end up not writing the license?
if it exists at a given time with a given license it's given that license exists at the time, most likely in written form, since many licenses reqire a copy of them is distributed along with it.
Random thought: Can a time travel use code, licensed under a license which has not yet been written?
`\tiny\sloth`: https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/meet-the-national-zoos-adorable-one-month-old-sloth-bear-cubs-the-first-born-there-in-more-than-a-decade-180987957/
https://preview.euromathsoc.org/news/new-author-guidelines-for-preparing-accessible-mathematics-content-196
For fans of colour models: https://evilmartians.com/chronicles/oklch-in-css-why-quit-rgb-hsl
I also noticed it recently. Because of the icon and the content of the answer it was easy to figure out that it was you. Also the acronym is quite easily extensible :)
oh, sorry, perhaps you weren't around back when I announced it in chat. Yes, I did.
Happy new year to you, too! You clearly invest so much fastness in code - you need to save it somewhere else :)
Happy new year!  (animation created by Ulrike Fischer)
I haven't yet watched myself, but the abstract sounds interesting: https://media.ccc.de/v/39c3-variable-fonts-it-was-never-about-file-size
anyone is, but I'm afraid no one of the regulars here is an avid ConTeXt user.
Duct tape solves all problems: https://spoon-tamago.com/duct-tape-typographer-shuetsu-sato-honored-with-design-award/
Wonderful holidays to all of you, who celebrate and a couple of nice calm days to everybody else! 
Genius idea: combining printing and lego https://www.thisiscolossal.com/2025/12/pedro-neves-a2z-learning-letterforms-lego-printing/
Sure, I will log an issue. I didn't understand the code and didn't see any discussion around it. I just saw the PR name and saw its history. It was there for around 4 years.
Log an issue - if you saw the PR, you know that there were questions about what it would actually do
Thanks, about `\cs_use:c`: I saw the PR. It mentions `\cs_use:N` also. Probably to generate `\cs_use:c`? Not sure. Sad that it didn't make it to the code. Any chance of getting to see `\cs_use:N` in the future?
For `bool`, unlike `zero` and `clear`, we have a strictly limited range of settings, so we never really need to 'reset to empty' - a `bool` is always exactly `true` or `false`, and initialisation isn't really the same
We have talked about `\cs_use:c`, but things got a bit complicated (Will had a long-standing PR that never went anywhere)
LaTeX3 puzzles: 1. Extending the analogy of having `\cs_show:c` and not `\show:c`, why don't we have `\cs_use:c`? `\use:c` doesn't really fit well in the suffixed functions. Well, it may make sense because of the `:c`, but that was an option for `\show` too. Maybe because `\cs_show:N` was needed, `\cs_show:c` was just generated as a variant and since `\cs_use:N` was never required, `\use:c` sufficed, but it still feels like an odd person out. 2. Why don't we have `\bool_(g)false_new:N` following the `gclear` and `gzero` paradigm?
yep, I read it. It's not even the first time I make the cut in one way or another. I remember a distinct rabbit like figure in the audience in one year.
The instead of "Loads of TkiZlings", the credits this year say "Loads of TikZlings and Friends" :)