the author must be absolutely brilliant! ('twas me)
just love all these ducks and dogs and whatever…
having fun right now with a little package called “ducksay”, really a nice one
that makes me start the weekend with relief 😄 😉 otherwise a fence would have been recommended…
Story time: My family once was on a vacation in France along with our family dog. Our landlord had ducks in a small pond on the property. One day my mother was sunbathing and reading in the garden when our dog brought her one of the ducks between here teeth. My mother was shocked and ordered the dog to let go of the duck. When she (the dog) opened her mouth the duck fell to the ground, unscathed only with a few tousled feathers and ran off. Morale of the story: No, they do play catch but don’t harm them.
maybe if we increase the pressure for seven days you’ll be able to add it last week?
you mean “soon” as in “yesterday”? https://github.com/samcarter/tikzlings/commit/94503f5d3c867a509e9e62e8f7369c5c51ff995f
you could create it from scratch (that’s what I did last time). Joseph has some stepping stone articles from 2011 regarding this: https://www.texdev.net/tags/#curriculum-vitae
not my doing, I’m only putting some pressure on samcarter to add this to the package soon.
I’m looking for a tex package to write CVs for job applications. Any suggestions?
I’m currently using moderncv, but it is difficult make it utilize space better. So I was exploring other options.
Thanks for providing a such a bounty-worthy answer 😃
Why should it? It’s the way this is handled in LaTeX for 30 years, why should hyperref
break this or be broken by it?
I can add hyperref to @Skillmon’s solution above without problems.
don’t the setcounter-based solutions break hyperref?
You typed a lot more code around the secnumdepth
- of course this takes time! 😃
\setcounter{secnumdepth}{0}
and drop all that setup. MWE:
xxxxxxxxxx
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{duckuments}
\setcounter{secnumdepth}{0}
\begin{document}
\duckument[toc]
\end{document}
If you ask a question, I could show a secnumdepth solution
hmm, so do I post a question and just self-answer that, or how?
Other users might have the same question and won’t be able to find whatever solution you might get, because it is hidden in a chat somewhere.
\renewcommand{\numberline}[1]{}%
gets me closer (the dots end too early)
ok, \titlelabel{}%
suppresses them just the same… still showing up in the ToC
oic, doing it that way is not recommended says the manual… grml… back to the research…
there’s titletoc
but I don’t get from the documentation how it all fits together
just the numbers rendered in the ToC; hyperlinks must still work
When I use \titleformat{name=\section}{\normalfont\sffamily\Large\bfseries}{}{0em}{}%
to make all sections unnumbered (like \section*
but still show up in the ToC), how can I remove the {,{,sub}sub}section numbers from the ToC as well?
Yes, as they rightly say:
it brings people to talk to each other about it 😉
The mysteries of TopAnswers 😛 Glad we have somebody new here to unearth them!
That “later” at least makes it make some sense.
Argh! This solved a longstanding mystery. I had completely given up on it thinking its calculation is from another world! 😂