Luckily European kitchens are mostly compatible with SI :) There is the occasional "add half a teaspoon of salt", but other than that `g` and `ml` dominates.
If you live in the US, you'll need this for following recipes. SI units is quite useful in other contexts, but not in a US kitchen.
One ought to redo [this](https://www.diningandcooking.com/1516998/finally-the-measuring-cheat-sheet-ive-needed/) in a proper vector format (e.g. using Ti*k*Z). :) ![volumes.jpeg](/image?hash=d1b7d9ac375e3537cfcb5b22acf4c2621cc17711f1e940ed22f05b5cad323817)
Miss you guys (on the plus side, Holland is nice to me until now -- I avoided eating tulip onions just to make sure not to annoy the local populace)
Some relatives of @Skillmon in Prague: ![Foto4795.jpg](/image?hash=d97cb73a36c6db5a5014d67c885c275cbfae943a7b18dd07ed9ddb6232a8b863)
You're welcome! BTW, AFAIK GhostScript doesn't have network access by itself, so calling this a *Remote Code Execution vulnerability* is a bit far-fetched. I think “arbitrary code execution” is enough here. Of course, for people who have set up GhostScript to process documents that “anyone” can submit (e.g., online document converter), there is, due to this setup, an RCE situation.
New [RCE bug in Ghostscript](https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/rce-bug-in-widely-used-ghostscript-library-now-exploited-in-attacks/): “A remote code execution vulnerability in the Ghostscript document conversion toolkit, widely used on Linux systems, is currently being exploited in attacks. (...) Tracked as [CVE-2024-29510](https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-29510), this format string vulnerability impacts all Ghostscript 10.03.0 and earlier installations. It enables attackers to escape the `-dSAFER` sandbox (...) This security bypass is especially dangerous as it allows them to perform high-risk operations, such as command execution and file I/O, using the Ghostscript Postscript interpreter, which the sandbox would usually block. (...)”
I was just looking if I could find a transcript I could link you to, but can't find one ... bit disappointed by the BBC (the thingy from the UK, not the "Bär Backup Crew") for not providing a transcript.
I'm sorry my English is not good enough to understand the jokes, but they had fun
I didn't yet listen to it, but this podcast sounds interesting: https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m0020xhm
Papercut research: https://journals.aps.org/pre/accepted/aa072Kc5A071ae0708c39799a466b7d26e3ac2a0e (preprint https://github.com/Jensen-Lab/PhysicsOfPaperCuts) Summary: 65 μm paper is evil
:D The results were hilarious. None looked even remotely like it. The one I posted was the most artsy result.
TBH, as an adult I don't particularly like any Haribo sweets, they are just too sweet, and I don't like licorice.
Sadly wrong, think more like a student in 8th grade (so around 13 or 14 years old).
KI tool to generate Ti*k*Z code from images or drawings: https://huggingface.co/spaces/nllg/DeTikZify Consider it more a plaything than actually working (at least for me that was the case). Because I'm infantile and wanted to see how it could cope with non-scientific drawings, I drew something an 8th grader would draw, and got the following result: ![blob](/image?hash=ad7002d1e1bfa6cb00cbbe8b84d433d84788d51b784ccfc1871b67cb5381b5b0) Quiz: What did 8th grade rabbit draw?