maybe if we increase the pressure for seven days you'll be able to add it last week?
you mean "soon" as in "yesterday"? https://github.com/samcarter/tikzlings/commit/94503f5d3c867a509e9e62e8f7369c5c51ff995f
you could create it from scratch (that's what I did last time). Joseph has some stepping stone articles from 2011 regarding this: https://www.texdev.net/tags/#curriculum-vitae
not my doing, I'm only putting some pressure on samcarter to add this to the package soon.

I'm looking for a tex package to write CVs for job applications. Any suggestions? I'm currently using moderncv, but it is difficult make it utilize space better. So I was exploring other options.
Version v2.3 of the TikZlings is on its way to CTAN. Cookie will soon be in your TeX distribution :) 
Why should it? It's the way this is handled in LaTeX for 30 years, why should `hyperref` break this or be broken by it?
You typed a lot more code around the `secnumdepth` - of course this takes time! :)
`\setcounter{secnumdepth}{0}` and drop all that setup. MWE: ``` \documentclass{article} \usepackage{duckuments} \setcounter{secnumdepth}{0} \begin{document} \duckument[toc] \end{document} ```
Other users might have the same question and won't be able to find whatever solution you might get, because it is hidden in a chat somewhere.
When I use `\titleformat{name=\section}{\normalfont\sffamily\Large\bfseries}{}{0em}{}%` to make all sections unnumbered (like `\section*` but still show up in the ToC), how can I remove the {,{,sub}sub}section numbers from the ToC as well?
Yes, as they rightly say: > it brings people to talk to each other about it 😉
Argh! This solved a longstanding mystery. I had completely given up on it thinking its calculation is from another world! :joy:
@samcarter: I also can't think of any reason that this could be interesting... but who knows? Nevertheless: it brings people to talk to each other about it ;-)
I don't really know why the time intervals would be interesting, but for example the stackexchange chat does something similar: if there are breaks, it inserts "9 hours later… " (and similar) between the messages.
@samcarter: ah ok - got it! :) bit unusual, but once you know it... ;-) The exact time stamp isn't so important, as long as newest messages are just at the bottom ;-) thanks for the explanation!
These are the times between messages. Messages are ordered newest at the bottom, older ones further up. If you'd like to see the exact time a message was posted, you can mouse hover over the message.